Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin 2003;41:17-18; doi:10.1136/dtb.2003.41317
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

{blacktriangledown}Yasmin advert withdrawn - when and how

In April 2002, Schering Health Care launched its combined oral contraceptive (COC) pill {blacktriangledown}Yasmin in the UK with an advertising campaign that centred on claimed 'lifestyle' advantages of the product. In our August 2002 article 'Is {blacktriangledown}Yasmin a "truly different" pill?', we concluded that the company's claim that Yasmin is "the pill for wellbeing" was unjustified and misleading and should be withdrawn.1 We also argued that there was no compelling published evidence that Yasmin offered any advantages over other, longer-established, COCs with regards to weight gain, skin condition or premenstrual symptoms. In September, we received a letter from Schering's solicitors threatening to sue us for defamation on the grounds that "the article has damaged the reputation of Yasmin and the Company". In December, we learned that the company had withdrawn the advertising. Here, we summarise the events that led to the withdrawal. We also consider the weaknesses this episode reveals about current procedures for controlling medicines promotion in the UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Garlick, W. (2003). Should drug companies be allowed to talk directly to patients?: NO. BMJ 326: 1302-1303 [Full Text]