Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin 2004;42:5-8; doi:10.1136/dtb.2004.4215
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

{blacktriangledown}Caspofungin and {blacktriangledown}voriconazole for fungal infections

Relevant BNF section: 5.2

Systemic fungal infections are difficult to treat and often fatal. Established treatment options include conventional amphotericin B or one of its lipid-based or liposomal formulations, or a triazole antifungal such as fluconazole or itraconazole. {blacktriangledown}Caspofungin (Cancidas - Merck Sharp & Dohme) and {blacktriangledown}voriconazole (Vfend - Pfizer) are two new antifungals for severe infections caused by Candida spp. (invasive candidiasis) and Aspergillus spp. (invasive aspergillosis). Caspofungin is the first licensed echinocandin antifungal, while voriconazole is a triazole. Promotional claims for caspofungin include that it "provides an effective, yet less toxic, alternative to amphotericin B" while voriconazole is claimed to offer "significantly improved survival in invasive aspergillosis compared with amphotericin B". Here we consider the place of caspofungin and voriconazole in managing patients with severe fungal infections.






About DTB - Privacy policy - Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online - Web site terms and conditions - Feedback

© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.