Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin 2004;42:89-93; doi:10.1136/dtb.2004.421289
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

What's wrong with prescribing hypnotics?

Relevant BNF section: 4.1.1

Expert bodies have long advised that use of hypnotic drugs should be limited to short courses for acutely distressed patients and should generally be avoided in elderly people.1–3 Despite this, more than 10 million prescriptions for hypnotics continue to be dispensed each year in England alone, mostly for benzodiazepines and drugs with similar actions such as zaleplon, zolpidem and zopiclone (so called 'Z-drugs').4 Around 80% of all such prescriptions are for people aged 65 years or over,5 and many patients remain on the drugs for months or years.6 Such prescribing carries many potential hazards for patients, including risk of dependence, accidents and other adverse effects on health.7 Here we review how the risks from hypnotic drugs can be minimised.






About DTB - Privacy policy - Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online - Web site terms and conditions - Feedback

© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.