Article Text

Download PDFPDF
High-dose PPI and aspirin as chemoprevention in Barrett’s oesophagus
  1. Teck K Khong1,
  2. Kuku Moyo2
  1. 1 Clinical Pharmacology, St George's University of London, London, UK
  2. 2 Clinical Pharmacology, St George's University of London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Teck K Khong, Clinical Pharmacology, St George's University of London, London, UK; tkhong{at}sgul.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Review of: Jankowski J, et al. Esomeprazole and aspirin in Barrett’s oesophagus (AspECT): a randomised factorial trial. Lancet 2018;392:400–8.

Commentary byDr Moyo Kuku and Dr Teck Khong Clinical Pharmacology, St George's, University of London, London, UK

Series EditorDr Teck Khong, DTB Associate Editor Clinical Pharmacology, St George's, University of London, London, UK

Key learning points

  • Long-term use of very high-dose proton pump inhibitor treatment may reduce the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, oesophageal adenocarcinoma or high-grade dysplasia in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus, particularly when combined with aspirin.

  • There was a small but statistically significant difference in the composite endpoint with esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily compared with esomeprazole 20 mg once daily after 8.9 years of follow-up.

Summary

The aspirin and esomeprazole chemoprevention in Barrett’s metaplasia trial (AspECT) found that a very high dose of a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) and aspirin used for at least 9 years reduced the composite outcome compared with a standard dose of a PPI.1

Overview

This randomised phase III open-label factorial study was conducted in 84 centres in the UK and one in Canada to assess the effect of very high and standard doses of esomeprazole (40 mg twice daily or 20 mg once daily) taken with or without once daily aspirin (300 mg in the UK and 325 mg in Canada) for 10 years in patients aged 18 years or older with an established or new diagnosis of Barrett’s oesophagus (at least 1 cm …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None declared. Refer to the online supplementary files to view the ICMJE form(s).

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.